The Last Blockbuster

HPR Last Blockbuster (1)

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Memories of 1980s and 1990s video store culture will draw viewers of a certain age to “The Last Blockbuster,” Taylor Morden’s breezy, goofy documentary on the king of the corporate movie renting business. Long since destroyed by on-demand ease and streaming subscriptions, there was a time when millions “made it a Blockbuster night” before the harsh reality check of technology and a handful of bad decisions relegated the brand to punchline status. Accordingly, the film’s home on Netflix provides a level of irony partially addressed in the movie’s overview of Blockbuster’s spectacular decline.

Alongside the historical bullet points, Morden relies heavily on talking head interviews with an odd assortment of industry professionals including Kevin Smith, Ione Skye, Jamie Kennedy, Brian Posehn, and several others. Many of the comments are the kind of earnest and heartfelt personal observations that will remind viewers of their own trips to pick out movies. Too often, however, the tongue-in-cheek tone veers into the empty calorie territory of VH1’s cable television time-filler “I Love the ‘80s,” as subjects like Doug Benson and Ron Funches can’t resist using their screen time to test what feels like standup material.

Morden has much better luck with central subject Sandi Harding, the manager of the world’s only surviving Blockbuster store, located in Bend, Oregon. Affable, smart, practical and positive, Harding is as dynamic as any of the on-camera “celebrities” rounded up by Morden and writer Zeke Kamm. In the hands of a different filmmaking team, one imagines that Harding’s story alone would have been enough to carry a feature-length story. It’s fascinating to follow Harding as she fills her Target shopping basket with new DVD and Blu-ray releases that will soon be made available on her rental shelves.

Blockbuster’s business plan, which used database software that helped streamline store-franchising replicability, buried thousands of unique mom-and-pop video rental shops during the peak of the company’s mid-2000s brick-and-mortar dominance. Morden doesn’t entirely ignore this foul stain, but he fails in any meaningful or sustained way to fully explore and engage the dark side of Blockbuster’s monopoly. A brief but welcome appearance by salty Troma Entertainment curmudgeon Lloyd Kaufman at least calls out the chilling effect of Blockbuster’s sanitized and family-friendly product policy on independents and boutique labels.

As the latest addition to the growing subgenre of documentaries about home video’s tumultuous and exciting journey, “The Last Blockbuster” fleshes out one more chapter in the saga that includes recent takes like “The Last Video Store” and “At the Video Store,” as well as “Rewind This!” and “Adjust Your Tracking.” Despite frequent and persistent predictions that physical media will eventually disappear — an idea reiterated at least once in “The Last Blockbuster” — the strength and popularity of collecting and the will to find and see movies that would never have been carried by a Blockbuster in the first place is reflected in the ongoing work of the Criterion Collection, Vinegar Syndrome, Arrow Video, Shout! Factory, Kino Lorber, Olive Films, the American Genre Film Archive, Anchor Bay, Blue Underground, Severin Films, and many other keepers of the flame.

Will we ever see a widespread return to video rental spaces where people interact face-to-face as they discover new cinematic adventures, make connections, and invite chance recommendations that cannot be replicated by algorithms? Time will tell.

Freeland

HPR Freeland (2021)

Movie review by Greg Carlson

An engrossing portrait that takes viewers deep into the world of marijuana farming in Northern California’s Humboldt County, “Freeland” rumbles along on the strength of a lovely central performance by Krisha Fairchild as Devi, a one-time hippie and last-woman-standing from the idealistic commune of the title. Fairchild, who played the fictionalized character who shares her name in nephew Trey Edward Shults’s debut feature “Krisha,” has been lauded for her efforts. Most recently, she received the award for Best Actress at the 2021 Fargo Film Festival.

“Freeland” filmmakers and longtime collaborators Kate McLean and Mario Furloni made the short documentary “Pot Country” in 2011, and that piece influences and informs the content of their feature. The writing and directing team (Furloni also serves as the cinematographer of “Freeland”) harnesses both techniques and storytelling sensibilities from their nonfiction experience. The exposition, confidently handled, invites the spectator into a fully-realized world. Devi takes seriously the cultivation of her plants. She employs a small team of young but like-minded workers to harvest the crop. Her relationship with Josh (Frank Mosley) appears at first glance to be rooted in trust.

McLean and Furloni will take the Krisha-Josh connection to fresh and unexpected places. Other pairings may be less pronounced and explosively dramatic, but are equally important. The directors lean heavily on the thematic mileage introduced by Krisha’s ex Ray (John Craven), dialing up the sense of regret and the longing for a different era. “Freeland” builds much of its tension around Krisha’s struggles to adapt to the major legal changes and regulations transforming her industry.

In addition to Mosley and Craven, the other supporting cast members add much depth to “Freeland.” Among those performers, Lily Gladstone deserves special mention. Unforgettable and brilliant in Kelly Reichardt’s “Certain Women,” Gladstone makes an impression here as Mara, another member of Krisha’s small crew. The actor capitalizes on every moment of her time on the screen, leaving one to wonder why she has not been cast more frequently in higher profile projects.

The movie, of course, is a tour de force showcase for Fairchild — an overnight sensation several decades in the making. Her first theatrical film credit listed in the Internet Movie Database is “Truckstop Cook” in Nancy Savoca’s excellent 1991 “Dogfight,” and she has more than two dozen additional television and movie appearances to her name. Devi is a meaty opportunity. “Freeland” is structured to constantly escalate the problems and increase the tension, and Fairchild takes the audience with her every step of the way. Even when the choices of McLean and Furloni strain credulity, Fairchild never plays a wrong note.

Like so many titles affected by the response to the global pandemic, “Freeland” had to cut a new path to find its viewers. Last year, the movie was scheduled in the Visions section of the canceled 2020 South by Southwest Film Festival — and its eventual distribution might have looked a bit different. From March 18 to 28, however, audiences can access “Freeland” as part of the virtual 2021 Fargo Film Festival. Tickets are on sale now.

Tom Brandau (1960-2021)

Tom Brandau Star Wars Han Solo Lobby Card (1)

Reflection by Greg Carlson

 

When I first made his acquaintance, I didn’t think I liked Tom Brandau.

And I was certain the feeling was mutual.

Following the unexpected death of Minnesota State University Moorhead film studies professor Ted Larson — a mentor to me and to Rusty Casselton and to many others — Rusty left Concordia to direct the film program at MSUM and I moved from MSUM into Rusty’s spot at Concordia.

Tom arrived a few years later to help Rusty expand opportunities for students and to grow and transform the major at my alma mater. Still hurting from the loss of Ted, I didn’t immediately realize that the addition of Tom was monumental. We regarded each other warily, mostly keeping our distance. The first unlikely icebreaker happened the day the Baltimore native noticed me wearing an Orioles cap. I grew up in Minnesota and cheer for the Twins, but since childhood I have also enjoyed the O’s: orange and black like the Spuds, Eddie Murray at 1B, and that irresistible logo design.

Slowly, steadily, gradually, my friendship with Tom expanded and deepened. I came to recognize that any jealousy or territoriality that once existed out of professional rivalry had completely disappeared. Tom fell in love with Janet, and his kindness and generosity only increased. He continued to pursue creative work and teaching, twin passions he approached with rigor and accomplished with humility. To both, he brought an unwavering commitment to the value of teamwork.

Since the announcement of Tom’s death on March 3, 2021, we have taken comfort in the memories being shared on social media. Each one of those anecdotes and testimonials lifts a heavy heart. I have read expressions of love and grief from Tom’s students, friends, colleagues, and collaborators — a large number known to me but others unknown. I feast on the specificity of these stories. I marvel at Tom’s largesse. Surely he must have cloned himself to find the time to nurture so many relationships. To actively and genuinely support others and take real interest in their projects.

Tom’s deep knowledge of the movies electrified a multitude of conversations. From the finer points of Vincent Price and Mercedes McCambridge in roles large and small to the special artistry of Verna Fields and James Wong Howe, Tom engaged fellow cinephiles with the exuberance of a kid unwrapping toys on Christmas morning. Some of the best discussions concerned Orson Welles, a Tom favorite. A trip down the rabbit hole of directorial technique in “The Lady from Shanghai” could wind its way toward a tragicomic accounting of late-career commercial work — “We know a remote farm in Lincolnshire where Mrs. Buckley lives. Every July, peas grow there.”

When “Star Wars” special effects photography legend Richard Edlund visited the Fargo Film Festival to receive the Ted M. Larson Award in 2019 (an honor bestowed on Tom the next year), Tom was undergoing cancer treatment and did not feel well enough to attend in person. I conspired with Janet to surprise Tom at home with a visit from Edlund. The arrangements were made but when the time came, Tom was not up to seeing anyone.

On closing night of the festival, Janet found me and Edlund in the crowd before the session began. She came bearing Tom’s signature gift: specially selected and carefully wrapped original lobby cards accompanied by handwritten notes. One for Edlund and one for me. I had witnessed Tom’s habit of giving lobby cards from his personal collection to mark special occasions. For years, I secretly hoped to be the recipient of one.

Leave it to Tom to express such gratitude for something that didn’t even get to happen.

I will miss him.

Collecting Movies with Dava Whisenant

CM with DW Image 2 (2021)

Photo courtesy Mari Mur.

Interview by Greg Carlson

Dava Whisenant received the Best New Documentary Director Award at the 2018 Tribeca Film Festival for her feature debut “Bathtubs Over Broadway,” which opened the 2019 Fargo Film Festival. Whisenant continues to collaborate with Steve Young, and their short comedy “Photo Op” is part of the 2021 Fargo Film Festival, which is being held as a virtual event from March 18 to 28.

 

Greg Carlson: How did you get interested in movies?

Dava Whisenant: I remember going to the video store in Harrison, Arkansas, where I lived until I was twelve. My father worked for the National Park Service, so we moved around a lot. We got to Miami around 1986. I would say I grew up on John Hughes. His movies were my favorites.

 

GC: What did you like about John Hughes?

DW: They spoke to the outsider. “Pretty in Pink” and “Some Kind of Wonderful.” I think my favorite movie of all time is “Planes, Trains and Automobiles.” So, there was something about comedy with heart.

 

GC: I just watched “She’s Having a Baby” last week. I love “Pretty in Pink” and “The Breakfast Club” and “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off.” 

DW: Hughes wrote so many movies. And I think “Planes, Trains and Automobiles” holds up. I watch it every Thanksgiving with my family. And I still cry every time.

 

GC: When you went to the video store, were you supervised? Were you allowed to rent whatever you wanted to see?

DW: I had a pretty conservative upbringing. My parents were pretty strict. My mom would not let me see “Jaws,” for example. But interestingly, she was into international films. She is hard of hearing and I think she really appreciated the subtitles, though she never said that. She took me to see “Babette’s Feast.” That experience set off some realizations — there’s a whole world out there!

 

GC: A mom who takes you to see “Babette’s Feast” is a great mom.

DW: I appreciate that she showed me things like that. In addition to movies, she started taking me to the opera when I was in junior high. But I was definitely supervised at the video store.

 

GC: Was there a movie you had to own?

DW: I was looking through what has stayed around. “Saturday Night Fever.” And “The Player” really resonated. I do have “Citizen Kane.” “The Killing,” which does not get talked about enough. That movie is pretty intense.

 

GC: I am happy that you have a great Stanley Kubrick movie in your collection. What did you see that made you think, “I want to do this.”

DW: Jane Campion’s “The Piano.” That was a powerful, moving story about a woman’s experience, directed by a woman. A formative viewing experience.

 

GC: Did you tell your folks that you wanted to go to film school?

DW: I took a television production class in high school. It was in that class I discovered a fondness for editing. It was the first time I made an edit, on this old, clunky tape-to-tape system. But I thought, “Wow, this is it! This is everything! The editing is where it happens.” But I started college as a theatre major before changing to film production.

 

GC: Was your family supportive?

DW: Yes. But they were nervous. Cautious, you know? Even the school was cautious. I went to the University of Miami and they made us double-major. Almost as if they were saying, “You might not make it in this field, so you better have something else.” But my second major was French!

 

GC: What got screened in film class?

DW: “Stranger Than Paradise” had a real effect on me. I loved the way it was shot, and it showed me you don’t need a massive budget. Growing up, I had only seen the big studio movies.

 

GC: It is brilliant that your professor chooses a movie by someone who famously dropped out of film school.

DW: Yes. It was also the dawning of my awareness of independent film. I love anything even slightly surrealist. “Twin Peaks” came out when I was in high school and turned me into a huge David Lynch fan. “Blue Velvet” and “Wild at Heart” and “Mulholland Dr.” — oh, just dark and sexy, but also with humor. I loved that stuff. Soderbergh was also a huge influence, especially “Schizopolis” and “Out of Sight” — I also dig “Full Frontal” — I appreciate Soderbergh’s curiosity to try new things.

 

GC:  You worked on a couple Soderbergh projects. How did that come to be?

DW: They were doing additional photography on “Solaris” and needed an editorial PA. A friend who knew I was a Soderbergh fan told me about the gig. I was editing on a TV show at the time and I quit my job so I could be a PA!

 

GC: Well, you recognized an opportunity.

DW: It was very cool being on his editorial team … he edited “Solaris” himself. I learned a lot just by observing the way he handled issues that would come up, and it was fun being able to teach him a couple of Avid tricks at one point. Later, when I made “Bathtubs Over Broadway,” he met with us after the Tribeca premiere and brainstormed about ways to get the movie seen. That was really meaningful.

Sometime after working for Soderbergh on “Solaris” and his “Equilibrium” segment in the anthology project “Eros,” I got a call to edit a feature for Joe Camp, the creator of “Benji.”

 

GC: I nearly wore out the original “Benji” soundtrack LP when I was a kid.

DW: Yeah, that’s a good one for the collection. Returning to collecting, did you have any of the DVDs in the Directors Label series from the early 2000s? Like Spike Jonze or Michel Gondry?

 

GC: All of them.

DW: Such inspiring stuff for people who like to create. Those anthologies were another thing I saw that made me feel like, “You can do this.” From commercials to short films to music videos, they were trying so many different things.

 

GC: It is hard to pick a favorite from that series. Maybe Gondry.

DW: Yes, the idea that you can just experiment. I also remember loving “Amarillo by Morning” by Spike Jonze.

 

GC: Did you ever get in trouble for watching a movie?

DW: If I did, I blocked it out. I was not allowed to see “Animal House” or “Caddyshack.” Somehow I saw “Airplane” though. “Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.”

 

GC: Were you deliberately seeking an opportunity to work in comedy when you went to Letterman?

DW: No. I didn’t think I would want to work on a television show because I was trying to get work on feature films. I had moved to New York when my then-fiance worked for Avid. “The Late Show with David Letterman” was transitioning to HD, so they needed people who knew Avid really well and could help facilitate the change. So I got hired because of my Avid skills.

But then it turned into something. It was so much fun to be behind the scenes there. They would let me go off and do an indie film and then come back to the show. For me, that place was like a family. The most supportive team. So many of them had been there for years. But I think they liked me because I was not worn down by it all and was having fun. I could not believe that I got to be there, working with those writers every day.

 

GC: How long did it take to hatch the idea that “Bathtubs Over Broadway” would make a great feature?

DW: Steve Young never told me about his record collection while I was working at Letterman. I had moved to Los Angeles and then the New York Times did a story about his book. People started coming out of the woodwork to ask him if he wanted to make a film about it, but I thought nobody gets this guy’s sense of humor better than I do. If anyone was going to direct it, it should be me!

Steve said he did not think I would be interested. I said I wanted to do it and immediately booked a flight to New York to do the first shoot we could use to pitch people. That’s the biggest problem with the subject matter — people didn’t understand what those musicals were, so it was difficult to get funding. That took about two years.

 

GC: I am so glad you are still collaborating with Steve. Did you make the most recent shorts during the pandemic?

DW: Yes. We were feeling cooped up and needed to do something creative. With the world at a standstill, what can we do that could take place outside and be funny? Steve just wrote those scripts so fast, and I said, “Wow, these are really good. Fly out here. Get a COVID test. Let’s just make these.”

One thing about Steve: all those years working on Letterman, he is so quick. We’ve written three television pilots recently. He’s written a screenplay. One thing about the pandemic — if you manage your time effectively, you can get a lot done.

 

GC: How do you approach directing Steve?

DW: So much of what he does in “Photo Op” is improv. I told him to just go for it, and Erin Eagleton, who plays opposite Steve, did a great job reacting to what Steve was giving him. It was so hard not to laugh. Because of the pandemic, I ended up shooting these things myself with my iPhone. No budget and limited time. Limitations can be excellent for creativity.

 

GC: I love how “Photo Op” turned out. And I am so glad it will be in the Fargo Film Festival.

DW: All three minutes and fifteen seconds of it!

Lorelei

HPR Lorelei 2 (2)

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Filmmaker Sabrina Doyle’s “Lorelei” aims for hardscrabble, working-class romance. Good onscreen chemistry between Jena Malone and Pablo Schreiber lifts the filmmaker’s debut feature out of traps set by occasionally mundane dialogue and predictable complications. Tonal and stylistic swings trade off between grim realism and dreamy expressionism. Savvy viewers will be able to say they’ve seen most of this world before — in stronger, more resonant packages — but the commitment of the lead performers sustains “Lorelei” in a way that earns solid audience support and respect all the way to the final frames.

Despite Malone’s higher profile, the movie’s point of view belongs to Schreiber’s prison parolee Wayland Beckett, a motorcycle gang member newly released following a fifteen-year stretch for armed robbery. Doyle sketches her blue collar Pacific Northwest milieu in a confident first act. The most effective scenes in the film follow Wayland as he reconnects with Malone’s Dolores, cautiously at first and then as headlong as a freight train. The out-of-sight but not out-of-mind high school sweetheart has enough economic struggles of her own and is hardly in position to help her ex. But in a blink, Wayland leaves his post-incarceration church shelter to move in with Dolores and her three kids.

Schreiber’s imposing physicality masks Wayland’s softheartedness if not his desire to avoid being placed behind bars again. That Zenlike calm, however, must be tested by conflicts and setbacks. As a screen type, Wayland belongs to a tradition of tender toughs yearning to make good while transitioning to life on the outside. Schreiber makes Wayland his own, but his character is a cinematic sibling to the kind of men brought to life by Matthias Schoenaerts in “Rust and Bone” and “The Mustang.” And even though Doyle does not intend to directly interrogate the prison system, hints of “American Me” and “American History X” accompany Wayland’s reform journey.

Despite devoting more space to Wayland, Doyle takes advantage of Malone’s gifts for conveying flinty determination. The performer is particularly good at balancing on the tightrope between impulsiveness and responsibility. Dolores deferred her dreams of competitive swimming when it turned out life had other plans for her. Doyle and Malone collaborate to imagine someone whose frustrations and bitterness threaten to boil over, but we always see just enough thoughtfulness and concern to understand that Dolores does the best she can — until she can’t.

Doyle leans in to a handful of cute touches. Wayland’s primary mode of transportation is a battered ice cream truck. Multiple aquatic motifs and links to the mythical siren of the film’s title culminate in a memorable family reunion. But for every blunt or clumsy choice, the filmmaker responds with an equal number of subtler grace notes. Like so many recent movies, “Lorelei” had to contend with pandemic-related changes. A planned world premiere at the Tribeca Film Festival evaporated when the event was postponed. Despite that disappointment, “Lorelei” continues to work its way through film festivals to what will hopefully be some kind of wider availability down the road. Even if it stays under the radar, it is a movie worth seeking out.

“Lorelei” is an official selection in the narrative feature category of the 2021 Fargo Film Festival, and will be available to screen as part of the virtual event from March 18 to 28.

Stalking Chernobyl

HPR Stalking Chernobyl (2021)

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Filmmaker and activist Iara Lee’s “Stalking Chernobyl: Exploration After Apocalypse” ventures into the sites and surroundings of the abandoned Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, introducing an assortment of “stalkers” drawn to the growing popularity of this upside-down variant on eco-tourism. Lee incorporates excellent, pre-disaster archival footage that emphasizes a constructed, utopian, Soviet-era idealism. And she balances that perspective with contemporary accounts of the explorers who seek thrills picking through the ghostly remains of Pripyat. The result largely avoids the fate of so much media designed primarily to inspire action. Despite the stern warnings predicting future catastrophe, Lee’s film investigates the past by sharing stories of the present.

Lee listens to a wide range of voices: children who lost parents to radiation-related illness, Pripyat residents forced to leave behind nearly all their belongings, sanctioned and unsanctioned guides trying to make an income, fearless (clueless?) enthusiasts who camp in abandoned buildings and drink water retrieved from the plant itself. Others explain their connections to a place many would never agree to visit. The historical content, especially the sections addressing the so-called “bio-robots” and liquidators who risked their lives in the aftermath of the disaster, is as harrowing as the ongoing concerns that forest fires will ignite radioactive material.

Despite the movie’s clear position on the dangers of expanding nuclear power, Lee does not shrink from the otherworldly allure that draws so many to Chernobyl and Pripyat. Photographers love the haunting, decaying rooms that appear to have been designed directly for some post-apocalyptic horror film or video game. The latter, Lee reminds the viewer, overlaps with the digital simulacra in “S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl,” the first-person shooter that draws from real-life geography as well as the sci-fi novella “Roadside Picnic” and Andrei Tarkovsky’s film “Stalker,” the latter of which gets a closing credits shout-out from Lee for its inspiring lyricism.

The piles of books in classrooms, the empty swimming pools, the desolate apartment blocks, the iconic Ferris wheel, and the rows of hospital beds make for grim sets captured over and over by the cameras of amateur and professional alike. One subject points out a central conundrum: no measures are in place to prevent visitors from interacting with and disturbing these spaces. No matter how conscientious some stalkers claim to be, things are taken and things are left behind. Dozens of dolls, manufactured long after 1986 and positioned to enhance the eerie effect, seem to multiply like an invasive species.

Whether or not you have seen the work of Maryann DeLeo or “Voices from Chernobyl” or “The Russian Woodpecker” or the popular 2019 HBO series or any number of other fascinating films on the subject, one suspects that a large group of viewers will watch “Stalking Chernobyl” with a sense of morbid curiosity, stunned that so many young people are undaunted by the long-term impact of the disaster on the environment and on the human population. But one look at the massive structure of the Duga radar array — dizzyingly captured by drone photography as well as by the daredevils who climb it — and you realize that the Exclusion Zone, or “Zone of Alienation,” will continue to attract attention no matter the level of hazard.

“Stalking Chernobyl: Exploration After Apocalypse” received the Best Documentary Feature Award from the 2021 Fargo Film Festival. The movie will screen as part of the virtual event from March 18 to 28. 

A Glitch in the Matrix

SD21 Glitch 3

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Rodney Ascher’s previous two nonfiction features, “Room 237” and “The Nightmare,” played out like the cinematic equivalent of staying up late with friends to swap scary stories, conspiracy theories, and the kind of half-remembered word-of-mouth urban legends that have only grown more potent in the internet age. The filmmaker’s new movie premiered at Sundance last week and debuts online today. “A Glitch in the Matrix” makes a fine addition to Ascher’s filmography, placing simulation theory on the shelf next to sleep paralysis and an obsession over the “hidden meanings” in Stanley Kubrick’s “The Shining.”

The most wide-ranging and expansive of the trio, “A Glitch in the Matrix” juggles a variety of bold pronouncements (reinforced by the likes of Elon Musk and Neil deGrasse Tyson) related to the idea that our experience is but an illusion, a mirage, a kind of constructed environment controlled by some superior or artificial intelligence. Popularized in its present incarnation by Swedish-born Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom, who appears in the movie, the argument that nothing is real serves as a springboard for Ascher to hear from true believers.

The onscreen presence of several subjects — a Harvard-educated engineer, a clergyman’s son, a teacher and artist — is intensified by Ascher’s decision to retain voices but upgrade visuals using motion capture animation and Fortnite-esque 3D avatars designed by Chris Burnham. We quickly grow accustomed to the sight of the videogame-like characters communicating via Skype in their otherwise everyday home-computing environments. Better-known figures, like mysticism and consciousness enthusiast Erik Davis and graphic fiction superstar Chris Ware, appear with no digital enhancements.

The backbone of “A Glitch in the Matrix” is not the influential science fiction blockbuster (which still receives plenty of Ascher’s attention), but the thoughts and writings of Philip K. Dick. The cult novelist and short story wizard — whose books have been adapted into “Blade Runner,” “Total Recall,” “Minority Report,” “A Scanner Darkly,” and “The Man in the High Castle” — delivered a 1977 address to an audience in France in which he shared in fascinating detail the reasons that convinced him he was living in a simulation. The various “clues,” often contained within the kinds of “meaningful coincidences” associated with Jungian synchronicity, become a common feature of simulation hypothesis adherents.

The most divisive structural choice Ascher makes is contained within the lengthy sequence in which Joshua Cooke, speaking to the director via phone from prison, recounts the night he killed his parents. Despite Cooke’s stated desire to help others avoid his fate, the so-called “Matrix Murderer” consumes far too much attention and the segment fails to transcend its true-crime, cautionary tale aura. The movie would have been much better off giving more time and space to Emily Pothast, who does not believe that we are trapped in a simulation.

Accompanied by clips from Sam Weiss’s classic short animation “The Cave,” narrated to perfection by Orson Welles, Pothast discusses the Allegory of the Cave and emerges as the movie’s strongest critical voice/voice of reason. Offering some tantalizing commentary on the erotic, Pothast proposes that (as she puts it in a post on her involvement with “A Glitch in the Matrix” published for “Medium”) “intimacy — that is, attending to the subjectivity of the other — is the antidote to solipsism.” No glitch in that thought.

The Mole Agent

HPR Mole Agent (2020)

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Maite Alberdi’s “The Mole Agent” is currently enjoying some award season love, with late January recognition from the National Board of Review in the Foreign Language Film group and steady buzz as a possible feature documentary Oscar contender and/or inclusion in the International Feature category as the official entry from Chile. Alberdi’s engaging movie was also broadcast this week on American television as part of PBS’s “POV” series, roughly one year after a premiere in the World Cinema Documentary Competition at the 2020 Sundance Film Festival.

“The Mole Agent” refers to the unlikely undercover spy of the title, a gentle octogenarian named Sergio Chamy. Sergio, seeking some adventure to occupy his time and his mind following the death of his wife, responds to an ad placed by a private investigator. The shamus, Romulo Aitken, seeks to plant the elderly widower in a nursing home to determine whether one of the residents is being treated with the appropriate care. Outfitted with a few key pieces of James Bond-esque gadgetry, including camera-enabled eyeglasses and pen, Sergio is dispatched, with the blessing of his daughter, to the facility.

Only 37 years old, Alberdi is a dynamic figure in documentary studies and practice. Like many nonfiction filmmakers, her production credits cover major tasks in editing, sound, and photography, and she continues to teach documentary filmmaking at the university level. Along with a co-authored book on theories of documentary, Alberdi has also written film criticism. Descriptions of her desire to capture the intimacies of interpersonal interaction and to consider the marginalized are central to “The Mole Agent,” the kind of movie you might initially think is about one thing, but by the end has transformed into something else.

Alberdi was able to collect her story elements by gaining access to the nursing home with her camera crew under the guise of making a broader movie focused on the day-to-day rhythms of the people living there. None of the residents knows anything about the mole’s true motives, and even though he does his best to please Romulo, Sergio’s mission soon takes a back seat to a series of more interesting connections between the spy and the women who are attracted to him in one way or another.

Alberdi plays out several threads that question longstanding patriarchal traditions of the Catholic church’s influence on society. The San Francisco Nursing Home, near Santiago, has a high ratio of women to men, something of an anomaly in Chilean eldercare. The most compelling of these stories is the one centered on lifelong virgin Bertita, whose religious devotion and earthly desires clash in a thorny conflict when she sets her sights on marrying Sergio — who has emerged as the most eligible bachelor in the place.

There is no doubt that Alberdi’s warm and sympathetic character study of Sergio deliberately capitalizes on humor derived from his bumbling ineptitude with the surveillance tech and his popularity with the ladies. Detractors have argued that the framing of the geriatric gumshoe’s questionable competence borders on exploitation, but followers of Alberdi’s work will counter that the filmmaker seeks to share with us a seldom-seen world filled with vibrant people desperately seeking autonomy, agency, and independence.

Collecting Movies with Tucker Lucas

CM with TL Portrait (2021)

Interview by Greg Carlson

My good friend Tucker Lucas works in media production for H2M in Fargo, North Dakota and is an ensemble member of Theatre B.

 

Greg Carlson: What is your collecting philosophy?

Tucker Lucas: I’ve been thinking a lot about this the past several months, as my collecting in general has spiked up again. I suspect this might be true for many people looking for ways to cope with the pandemic. The things that I collect and the things that I like to keep near me are things that I find precious in some way. Objects that I like and that I appreciate for aesthetic or emotional value — things that bring me back to a time and place.

When I look at my collection, the things that I’m acquiring right now are things I would have been interested in collecting when I was ten. Comic books are the primary choice, but also movies and old video games that I played as a kid.

 

GC: Didn’t your dad get you started with comics?

TL: I collect specific comic books that remind me of the ones I was given by my dad when I was five and wanted to learn how to read. He gave me all his old comics from the 70s, mostly Bronze Age Marvel stuff. “The Amazing Spider-Man,” “Captain America,” “Power Man and Iron Fist,” and some Westerns. I became obsessed with that type of object. I imprinted on the design of Marvel comics from the 70s. The smell of the yellowed paper. They bring out so many emotions that I like having them around.

 

GC: For every collector, there is an element of curation. As long as I have known you, things in your collection come and go. For other collectors, and I am in this group, once something comes in, it never leaves.

TL: It really depends on the item. I adopted that rule about four years ago when my comic book collection was getting out of control. I was buying huge amounts of comics every week. You could get them so inexpensively, I thought, “Why not?”

As the numbers grew, I realized I wasn’t getting what I wanted from collecting. I was hoarding. I thought about it and realized I did not care about so many of these comics. I realized what I really cared about and did a massive purge. At the peak, I was hanging on to about 4000 comic books and now I have around 1700. It felt great to let go. When I look at my comics now, I know that everything on the shelf is special to me. If I take anything off the shelf, I can tell you why it’s there and why I have it.

 

GC: Beyond the prominence of comics, movies, and video games, do you keep anything else?

TL: Trading cards and some books. Only in the past year have I concentrated on movies.For the longest time, I did not care much for keeping physical media.

CM with TL OK Computer (2021)

GC: What changed?

TL: I never really collected physical copies of movies as a kid. I had some, but they weren’t really given a place on my shelf. It took me not caring about physical media for a long time before I developed an appreciation for having the object.

An analogy would be this: I wasn’t into collecting vinyl records even though I have always kept music in some format, usually just digital files. When we worked together on “A Perfect Record,” the short documentary about collector Dean Sime, I could see how much he was getting out of record collecting. Similar to what I get out of comic collecting. Even down to the look of spines on the shelf and the beautiful artwork.

Now, when I listen to “OK Computer,” I take the time to put it on the turntable. It’s an intentional experience.

 

GC: Like Dean says, the process of listening to a record is very tactile.

TL: Right. Now everything is digital and online — and that’s the world I have been living in. My experience of consuming media is like hooking my brain up to a firehose. There is so much of it, I can’t really appreciate it. By hunting down physical media, I can reestablish a relationship with these older movies that I love.

When I decided this past year to collect movies, I recognized a big pitfall. You can go to a thrift store and find ultra cheap VHS and DVD and even Blu-ray. Once again, there was a danger of hoarding. So instead, I wanted to give a present to ten-year-old me. My first goal of movie collecting is superhero content — any and every movie and TV show, both animated and live action.

The reason I want to do this is from a memory. Around 1994, my dad and I were getting into his car in front of his house. It was summer. He turns on the radio. I hear the DJ say, “Rumors of an X-Men movie in the works.” And I remember saying out loud to my dad, “That’s not gonna happen.” Little did I know that the future would be an embarrassment of riches for superhero movies.

So now I am building the shelf of that content.

CM with TL XMen (2021)

GC: You recently said something about collecting the same title on multiple formats.

TL: Yeah. I wasn’t sure I would like it, but I do. To me, certain aspects of curation are an absolute blast. One is the hunt. Looking for and finding a treasure. Two is creating the display. Putting it up and making it look a certain way.

For a long time, that was why I didn’t collect movies. I think most movie packaging is pretty horrible, pretty ugly. A lot of garbage design.

 

GC: DVD gets my vote for the worst packaging mess. From the Amaray/keep case to the snapper cases and the digipaks and super jewel cases, they were all far too bulky. If you want to preserve lots of content in a small space, DVD misses the mark.

TL: I’m not sure Blu-ray learned many lessons from DVD. It is not just the plastic case, it’s the design of the artwork. I just pulled my Blu-ray copy of “The Avengers” and it pales in comparison to the cover art of any comic in my collection. I can just randomly take a comic off the shelf and the cover is going to be gorgeous — here is “Uncanny X-Men” 260. This is fantastic. It’s a Jim Lee cover. It’s an image of Dazzler’s stalker. Kind of two-tone pink in the color scheme. Absolutely beautiful cover.

So to make a long story longer, collecting the same title in multiple movie formats makes the display more interesting to me. I have “X-Men” on VHS and DVD and Blu-ray. If they had released “X-Men” on LaserDisc I would have picked it up. At some point I would buy the 4K.

 

GC: Even the spine of a VHS conveys more information than any of the disc formats. I love the thumbnail squares featuring characters from the movie. I agree with your argument that most major studio covers are lacking. Some labels care. Vinegar Syndrome’s 4K release of “The Beastmaster” in the fancy magnet-clasp box is one example. The “Citizen Kane” 70th anniversary set is very nice. Criterion’s Showa era Godzilla set. Of course then you have the problem of all these different shapes and sizes to contend with. Maddening for the perfectionist. But you like the different shapes next to each other!

TL: Yes. I also have all the players ready to go for every format I own. I am still an analog video nerd, because that’s how I first got into video. I love my professional-grade CRT monitor paired with a really nice VCR. It is poison to the eyes if you try to watch analog content on a 4K television. Absolute nonsense. But if you stick with the tech designed for the format, it will look fantastic.

The reality is that there are titles that will only be available on a given format. My favorite edition of “Blade Runner” is the director’s cut on DVD. Not the Blu-ray. To my eyes, the DVD version plays back with a more dreamlike quality at that lower resolution.

 

GC: What movies in your collection are particularly prized by you?

TL: Superhero movies may be the primary collecting focus but they are not the only movies I have. I enjoy collecting animation across formats. Disney Black Diamond clamshells are fun. I have a copy of “King Kong vs. Godzilla” that was given to me by my good buddy Mikey Sunram. It’s an import from Japan. It contains the original theatrical cut with English subtitles. I can’t read the text on the cover except for the word Godzilla. I grew up with the American cut. As a kid, you didn’t know that more than one version existed.

When I met Mikey and he found out I liked Godzilla, he gave me this VHS tape as a gift. When I put it in, it rocked my world. It was like watching a brand new movie. I will cherish this tape as long as it lasts. When I look at it, I think of enjoying Godzilla as a kid. And I also think of my friendship with Mikey.

CM with TL VHS (2021)

GC: I love those connections we all make.

TL: My comics make me think of my dad and my friend Matt Burkolder. He gave me the original run of “Watchmen.” He also gave me the first fifteen issues of “Wolverine” volume two. It’s illustrated by my favorite comic artist, John Buscema. It was one of the last things Matthew gave to me before he passed away. So even if there is some monetary value, it cannot compete with the emotional value.

 

GC: Was there a movie that got you excited about film and filmmaking?

TL: It was my first visit to a shoot. I was a kid when the Blenders made a music video at Ben Franklin Junior High, where my dad taught. Before that, I had no concept of what making movies looked like. So now I saw camera people and makeup artists and there were multiple takes of different shots. Blew my mind. Around the same time, I started playing with the VHS camcorder at home.

The structure of moviemaking is similar to comic books. Essentially sequential art. And montage. And creating illusion.

 

GC: Like storyboards come to life.

TL: I grabbed on right away. Our next door neighbors were the Boswells. And I was friends with Ryan. Ryan’s dad Paul was a huge movie fan. In the basement of their house was a massive wall covered with VHS tapes. This man was a movie lover. He had the Universal monster movies. I watched “Creature from the Black Lagoon” for the first time at the Boswell house.

I remember telling Ryan’s dad I wanted to be a moviemaker. And he said, “You want to make movies? Let me show you something.” And he grabbed a sheet of paper, and he wrote out the concept of the wide shot, the medium shot, and the close-up. I thought, “This is what I’m seeing!” It was the first time cinematic language was deconstructed for me. And that was when I became absolutely hooked.

 

GC: What did you see in the theater that changed the game for you?

TL: “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles” landed at a prime age for me. The cartoon was out and I was already obsessed. I remember sitting in the theater — packed house, kids sitting in the aisles, just shoved in everywhere. The lights go down and the crowd is insane. It was surreal and it transported me. The closest I have come to that feeling was watching “Avengers: Endgame.”

The effects by Jim Henson’s Creature Shop were so good. Even now I think they hold up. As a kid, it was completely real. Completely real. And there are scenes in that movie that I still play in my head. I paid close attention to the framing. There is a part where April gets jumped by the Foot Soldiers and Raphael defeats this group in three moves. The fight takes ten seconds, maybe not even. It is a cool moment, the way it is edited together. Intense and really neat and as a kid I thought it was the most amazing thing ever.

I can remember every single frame of that movie, I have watched it so many times. I keep it on every format. I owned it on Blu-ray before I had a Blu-ray player.

Shadow in the Cloud

HPR Shadow in the Cloud (2021)

Movie review by Greg Carlson

New Zealand filmmaker Roseanne Liang teams up with Chloe Grace Moretz for B-movie madness in “Shadow in the Cloud.” An utterly ridiculous creature feature set aboard a bomber en route from Auckland to Samoa in 1943, Liang’s film must be approached with a healthy suspension of disbelief and monster-positive open-mindedness. Head-scratching lapses in basic logic and common sense have never stood in the way of a grand time watching the cinema’s long tradition of mutants, freaks and malevolent goblins. Those low budgets and short running times promise a certain kind of pleasure, and “Shadow in the Cloud” operates in that spirit.

Moretz plays Flight Officer Maude Garrett, a last minute passenger assigned to a Flying Fortress ominously named “The Fool’s Errand.” Carrying a mysterious package and paperwork validating her confidential mission — much to the chagrin of the flight’s skeptical crew — Maude is allowed to take off. Confined to the Sperry ball turret, Maude listens on the intercom to a steady stream of ugly sexual harassment from nearly every man on board. Despite being subjected to awful insults and unchecked misogyny, Maude asserts her qualifications and stands her ground.

If the threat of violence and rape wasn’t enough, Maude quickly realizes an equally pressing concern crawling around the exterior of the aircraft: a nasty, bat-like gremlin threatens to disable the plane. Maude knows she faces an uphill battle convincing her traveling companions that a bugbear of folklore poses a clear and present danger. Liang juggles the whole works efficiently and takes a staging risk that pays off handsomely — nearly all the action of the film’s first half is confined to the claustrophobic, prison-like sphere where Maude is stuck. Calling to mind aspects of both the famous Randall Jarrell poem and the “Amazing Stories” episode “The Mission,” Liang keeps the camera, and our attention, on Moretz in the bubble.

The gremlin plot shares screentime with the unfolding drama surrounding the contents of Maude’s top secret traveling case as well as the arrival of Japanese fighters eager to shoot down the B-17. It is the sabotaging beastie, however, that commands our primary attention, and Liang pays her respects to a wide range of classic pop culture precedents. From Roald Dahl’s 1943 book anticipating the Disney movie that never happened to Bob Clampett’s Bugs Bunny cartoon “Falling Hare,” the “Shadow in the Cloud” team acknowledges gremlin mythology with genuine admiration and respect.

The movie’s strongest gremlin connection, however, is through disgraced co-screenwriter Max Landis, whose famous father John Landis co-produced and co-directed the ill-fated “Twilight Zone: The Movie,” which features the George Miller-helmed remake of the well-known episode “Nightmare at 20,000 Feet.” The younger Landis, accused by eight women of criminal acts including rape, physical assault, emotional violence and sexual abuse, was removed as a producer of “Shadow in the Cloud” even as Writers Guild of America rules kept his screenwriting credit on the film.

While the knowledge of Landis’s involvement in “Shadow in the Cloud” invites a closer and darker reading of the film’s most menacing lines of dialogue, Liang and Moretz have both emphasized the extent to which the movie was re-written before shooting began. Director and star prevail, even if the end result is as battle-scarred and bullet-riddled as the fuselage of the cursed vessel that functions as the site of the drama. A concluding montage set to Kate Bush’s “Hounds of Love” shares period clips of the many women who served in the air forces of the Allies of World War II.