Movie review by Greg Carlson

As a reflection on our perilous political landscape, “Bugonia,” from the ever curious and boundary-stretching auteur Yorgos Lanthimos, joins several other 2025 releases that have something to say about a deeply divided populace and the fine line between order and chaos. Landing somewhere between “One Battle After Another” and “Eddington” on the “both sides are bad” spectrum, “Bugonia” is smaller in scale than either of those movies, even if its ideas are equally intriguing. One of the producers of “Bugonia” is Ari Aster, who cast frequent Lanthimos collaborator Emma Stone in a thankless and arguably insulting role in his “Eddington.” Stone is on much firmer footing here, adding another wild, even astonishing performance to her filmography.

Along with Stone, who portrays high-powered, take-no-prisoners pharma/chem CEO Michelle Fuller, Jesse Plemons re-teams with his “Kinds of Kindness” pals as Teddy Gatz, an angry and frustrated conspiracy theorist whose mother’s illness and coma he blames on Fuller and her profits-over-people practices. Along with his neurodivergent cousin Don (Aidan Delbis), Teddy kidnaps Michelle. When she regains consciousness in the basement of the rural home shared by her abductors, Michelle – now covered in an antihistamine cream and with her head shaved – is informed by Teddy that he believes she is an extraterrestrial from the Andromeda galaxy who has terrible plans for the humans of Earth.

This set-up, which featured prominently in the film’s trailer, gives two electrifying actors a nifty sandbox to practice their craft and show off their chops. Stone and Plemons are compelling, shifting effortlessly between the worst and the most humane aspects of Fuller and Gatz. A great deal of the action is slow-burn magic (occasionally reminiscent of the otherworldly magnetism of Lanthimos breakthrough “Dogtooth”) in which Teddy, smarter than he initially appears, struggles to keep pace with the steel-nerved Michelle, who somehow manages to be intimidating and nearly in control even though she is the one tied up and held against her will.

Stone and Plemons have the lion’s share of big scenes and dialogue, but Delbis is terrific in a key role. Even though the viewer assumes that Don is willing to go along with Teddy’s plans without challenge, he surprises us more than once with insights not within the grasp of his relative and closest companion. Lanthimos also escalates narrative tension with the introduction of Casey (Stavros Halkias), a local law enforcement officer whose grim personal history with Teddy colors their exchanges during the Fuller disappearance investigation. Halkias, known for his sharp stand-up crowd work and provocative podcast commentary, notches another outstanding turn here, following his hysterical and fearless role in last year’s underseen “Let’s Start a Cult,” which he co-wrote.

The script for “Bugonia” was written by Will Tracy as an adaptation of the South Korean film “Save the Green Planet!” That 2003 movie’s director Jang Joon-hwan was originally attached to the English language remake prior to Lanthimos coming to the helm. Not to be confused with its floral homonym, “Bugonia” refers to the ancient folk practice built on the myth that bees spontaneously generate from the flesh of dead cows. Teddy’s work as a beekeeper is one of a small handful of clues regarding the title’s connection to the thematic subtext known only to Lanthimos in full form. For the rest of us, “Bugonia” is an often wondrous and frequently inexplicable cosmic trip ready to delight anyone willing to tune in to its peculiar wavelength.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Noémie Merlant, working from a script she wrote with Pauline Munier and her “Portrait of a Lady on Fire” collaborator Celine Sciamma, directs herself in “The Balconettes” (the clever/cheeky English-language retitling of the original French “Les femmes au balcon”). An antic and frantic feminist horror-comedy thriller, “The Balconettes” nods to Hitchcock’s classic “Rear Window” by way of Pedro Almodovar’s many candy-colored visions of women on the edge. The movie begins with a tantalizing prologue in which a harried and victimized spouse named Denise (Nadege Beausson-Diagne) reaches a domestic breaking point that ends with the sharp edge of a dustpan connecting with the back of her awful husband’s cranium. The incident serves as an omen and a warning.

Denise’s apartment neighbor Nicole (Sanda Codreanu) is a writer whose imagination will soon kick into high gear and stay there. Frustrated and horny, Nicole works on her craft in what appears to be a largely worthless online group workshop with a paid “mentor,” even though the adventures about to unfold should offer more than enough inspiration for dynamic storytelling. Nicole’s roommate Ruby (Souheila Yacoub) is a free-spirited camgirl whose morning-after canoodling with a pair of lovers points to an appetite for polyamory in sync with the expressive pasties, mesh tops, piercings, and stick-on rhinestones that draw attention from online clients and those encountering her in the real-world.

Merlant’s sweaty Elise soon arrives from Paris to join her pals in Marseilles. An aspiring actor initially decked out like Marilyn Monroe, Elise struggles to communicate with Paul (Christophe Montenez), her drip of a husband who cannot leave her alone or respect her personal space and her physical body. Throughout all of the expository set-up, “The Balconettes” shows an abiding interest in the gender-specific power dynamics that soon take up the principal plotline. Following a sexual assault that unites the trio in a farcical and outré mission to dispose of the deceased rapist’s corpse, Merlant elects to spin several plates at once.

While there is no doubt that Merlant could have used some of Sciamma’s more sophisticated filmmaking skills in the execution of the movie, “The Balconettes” digs into its world with considerable audacity. If we can suspend enough disbelief to accept that the women would make the questionable decision to not call the police, other threads make just as much narrative sense – even when Merlant fails to fully engage or drill down. For example, Nicole is pestered by visions of the ghosts of abusive men in an intriguing premise for a writer seeking her voice. It’s a strong enough idea to support more prominent exploration.

Overall, Merlant’s “see what sticks” approach strikes enough satisfying notes to recommend the film, culminating with some body-positive, free-the-nipple energy that struts proudly through the denouement . Visual expressions of sweltering heat waves invoking mercury-busting emotional intensity have been a filmmaking staple for decades. Think of the perspiration on display in “Lawrence of Arabia,” “A Streetcar Named Desire,” “Cool Hand Luke,” “Body Heat,” “Do the Right Thing,” “Barton Fink,” and “Rear Window.” “The Balconettes” doesn’t reach the same rewatchability of any of those titles, but you’ll still want to mop your brow.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Now available on Amazon Prime following its world premiere last month as the opening night selection of the Toronto International Film Festival’s golden anniversary, “John Candy: I Like Me” is a heartfelt and star-studded appreciation of the late actor, who died in 1994 at the age of 43. The movie’s director is actor/filmmaker Colin Hanks, and his connections prove most valuable in attracting a phenomenal gallery of household-name talent who worked with and admired Candy from the very beginning to the very end. In a savvy maneuver to confront the anticipated (and inevitable) accusations of a hagiographic anointing of Saint John, the movie starts with Sahara-dry and predictably hilarious Bill Murray, who later cites an instance of his friend “milking” a scene in a show they did together as evidence of Candy at his worst.

Along with Murray, many others testify to Candy’s decency, graciousness and largesse as much as his seemingly effortless on-camera skill. Players who shared his orbit include some of the biggest and best names in comedy: Dan Aykroyd, Eugene Levy, Catherine O’Hara, Andrea Martin, Steve Martin, Tom Hanks, Martin Short, Mel Brooks, Dave Thomas, Conan O’Brien and Macaulay Culkin are among those who pay respects with remembrances that Candy faithful will be thrilled to hear. “I Like Me” is not a critical biography, but each time Hanks makes space for Candy’s fellow pros to describe their favorite characters and bits, the movie takes flight.

Along with that famous fraternity, Hanks talks to Candy’s wife Rosemary and their adult children Christopher and Jennifer to fashion a behind-the-scenes thread that thematically links Candy’s premature death to the loss of his own father Sidney, who died at the age of 35 on John’s fifth birthday. The filmmaker strives for the right balance of commentary on Candy’s physical size, especially as related to the implications that eating, drinking and smoking functioned as coping mechanisms for his insecurities and fears. Rosemary points out that when John lost weight, studio executives would pressure him to stay big. O’Brien captures the essence of that downside: “This industry is very unhealthy for people-pleasers.”

Hanks covers Candy’s entrepreneurial ambitions by unpacking the actor’s ownership stake in the Canadian Football League’s Toronto Argonauts, a chapter which also dovetails with a motif regarding the close identification that fellow countrymen felt with Candy as proud Canadians. The film’s title derives from what is arguably Candy’s signature performance in “Planes, Trains and Automobiles” for writer/director John Hughes, yet another close friend. Culkin argues that even though people tend to think first of Molly Ringwald, Candy – who was in more films written, produced, and/or directed by Hughes than any other performer – was that filmmaker’s ultimate representative.

In strategically selected spots, Hanks includes footage of Candy’s memorial service, highlighting Catherine O’Hara’s moving tribute and audio of Dan Aykroyd’s beautiful encomium, in which Candy’s “allied professional, creative brother and fellow Canadian” remembers a “titan of a gentle, golden man” in what is surely one of the most stirring eulogies I have ever heard. If space permitted, I wouldn’t hesitate to reprint the entire text, in which Aykroyd eloquently describes Candy as “magnificent of visage, eyes and frame,” and ultimately “the sweetest, most generous person ever known to me.” I urge you to locate and listen to the entire thing. I additionally hope that we will all be so fortunate to have someone as munificent in our own lives.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Dream-factory documentarian Alexandre O. Philippe connects with a Hollywood legend in “Kim Novak’s Vertigo,” the latest in a series of features exploring the filmmaker’s many movie-related passions and obsessions. In my 2022 review for the fascinating and accomplished “Lynch/Oz,” I wrote, “Philippe has continued to develop a confident storytelling voice somewhere between the accessibility of Laurent Bouzereau and Jamie Benning and the erudition of Mark Rappaport and Thom Andersen.” The Novak exercise falls squarely in the Bouzereau school (not a bad thing at all), missing some of the headier Rappaport-style scholarship of his most penetrating work. On the other hand, wouldn’t you like to hang out with Kim Novak?

With few exceptions, including a surprise appearance at the 2014 Oscar ceremony to co-present with Matthew McConaughey and the recent in-person acceptance of the Golden Lion for Lifetime Achievement at the 82nd Venice International Film Festival, the largely private star has remained away from the public eye for decades. She expressed disappointment in her unhappy experience making “Liebestraum” with writer-director Mike Figgis in 1991, walking away from onscreen work to concentrate on painting and writing poetry from the quiet of her Oregon ranch. Her husband of 44 years, the veterinarian Robert Malloy, died in 2020.

Clearly, Philippe earned the trust and confidence of Novak, who welcomes the filmmaker into her home and her life. They sit together for several intimate conversations that invite viewers to eavesdrop on all sorts of revelations and reflections on a glorious career that peaked in an era when young women faced grim harassment and misogyny just doing their jobs. Valued primarily for box office potential driven by perceived sexual attractiveness to the powerful men inside the film industry and the common men purchasing tickets, pinups and fan magazines, actors like Novak were commodified. Clearly, little has changed (see Novak’s post-Oscar telecast open letter, in which she called out the bullies who commented on her physical appearance).

Unlike Philippe’s earlier Hitchcock deep-dive “78/52,” which closely examined the “Psycho” shower scene in microscopic detail, “Kim Novak’s Vertigo” doesn’t stay trained on the impact and influence of his 1958 masterpiece for the duration of the documentary’s tidy 76-minute running time. In some sense, it’s a missed opportunity, especially in comparison to work like “Chain Reactions” and “Leap of Faith: William Friedkin on The Exorcist,” since superfans of the Master of Suspense are ready to gobble up any and every new morsel. Both Novak and Philippe refrain from any negative takes on the controversial auteur.

Even though Novak has not acted in a film for more than three decades, she clearly applies many well-earned lessons to the construction of this new “performance” for Philippe. In what could be the most memorable single sequence in the documentary, Novak unboxes her iconic gray Edith Head-designed wool pencil skirt and single-breasted jacket, drinking in its aroma as Philippe emphasizes its powerful aura as one of cinema’s enduring costumes. It’s a theatrical moment that links together Novak, Hitchcock, Philippe, and the viewer. And even if our once-and-forever Madeleine/Judy lays it on a little thick, “Kim Novak’s Vertigo” reminds us exactly why certain movies make us dizzy.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

The multiple meanings of the title location in Mercedes Bryce Morgan’s “Bone Lake” cover the sex and death spectrum that will flummox Diego (Marco Pigossi) and Sage (Maddie Hasson) as soon as they discover their well-appointed getaway rental has been double-booked to Will (Alex Roe) and Cin (Andra Nechita). Well before the age of Airbnb and Vrbo, storytellers have enjoyed toying with the possibilities of frustrated travelers who must figure out how to navigate the inconveniences of overlapping dates on the calendar. And despite showing up in romantic and screwball comedies as well as other genres, horror has been a regular landing spot for the conceit: “Barbarian,” “Gone in the Night,” “Holistay,” and “Double Booked” are a few of the recent movies that put a twist on the durable set-up that owes a cinematic debt to loose thematic variants and variations going as far back as James Whale’s spiritual touchstone “The Old Dark House.”

Morgan, working from a script by Joshua Friedlander, pays stylistic homage to the vibes of the lurid 80s and 90s erotic thriller, leaning heavily into the cheese and cheesecake with a wink and a curled lip. Temptation, jealousy, kink, infidelity, commitment, and horniness swirl in the air as Will and Cin play head games with their comely new friends. Morgan tightens the screws with an effortlessness that would be at home in a big-budget studio-backed movie with well-known stars. That said, the relatively little-known Hasson, Nechita, Pigossi, and Roe combine as a formidable foursome game for the increasingly over-the-top complications that pay dividends for horror hounds ready to see some contusions and lacerations.

During the ride, Morgan shifts gears from sexual electricity to fight for survival. Revealing one major and messed-up twist late in the game, the filmmaker weaves together the macabre with the surprise violation of a cultural taboo that feeds into the world-building lore of the haunted setting. For those who have embraced the unhinged events to this point, disbelief has long been suspended (in a good way). Outside the spiral of dread, the frustrations of Sage and Diego as a couple working hard to preserve their relationship in the face of career and life-related challenges is completely believable and grounded in language familiar to anyone who has maintained a long-term romantic partnership.

One of the most satisfying aspects of “Bone Lake” falls into the category Alfred Hitchcock sometimes called “icebox talk.” For an exquisite little stretch, Morgan teases the audience with dangling threads edited in a way to introduce doubt in the mind of the viewer as to whether Will and Cin “will sin” to successfully seduce the new arrivals. Morgan might have pushed even harder with the cunning hypotheticals (despite one particular car scene being near perfect). Of course, aficionados of the weird and the sick might have desired even more libidinous explicitness to accompany the violence. Like most American genre films, “Bone Lake” chooses raw gore over raw flesh.

“Bone Lake” world-premiered at the 2024 Fantastic Fest in Austin, Texas, where it was one of the most crowd-pleasing experiences I enjoyed. In my original notes, I described the movie as a dirty cocktail blending straight-to-video energy with trashy Lifetime melodrama that is as funny as it is untethered from reality. At the screening, the promotions team handed each guest an elaborately decorated cookie shaped like a severed digit complete with engagement ring, perfectly capturing the film’s tongue-in-cheek, or perhaps finger-in-cheek, attitude.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

“One Battle After Another,” the brilliant new masterwork from Paul Thomas Anderson, joins Wes Anderson’s “The Phoenician Scheme” on the short list of the year’s best films. Along with the shared directorial surname and the perfect casting of Benicio del Toro, the two movies balance rich text/subtext with vital father-daughter narratives (not to mention huge laughs and several tears). The films make a handsome double feature. The Andersons are notable cinephiles who constantly pay homage to favorite movies and moviemakers, both famous and obscure. But they are also distinctive individual voices worthy of the auteur label and are among the finest cinematic storytellers working today.

Loosely inspired by Thomas Pynchon’s 1990 postmodern novel “Vineland,” “One Battle After Another” conjures memories of any number of big screen paranoid thrillers that thrust the viewer into a breathless chase broken up by fleeting moments of intimacy and quiet. Anderson’s subject matter suggests the artist is downright clairvoyant. A fried left-wing revolutionary, whose activities would certainly be labeled antifa by the current administration, tangles with an old nemesis and bête noire aligned with a Christian-fascist cabal of powerful racist puppetmasters over the fate of his child, who has grown up without her mother.

With hints of Javert and Jean Valjean represented by the cat-and-mouse pursuit of Leonardo DiCaprio’s Bob Ferguson by Sean Penn’s Col. Steven J. Lockjaw, as well as Hugo’s affinity for marrying political philosophy with themes of familial love (not to mention the author’s emphasis on classic surrogate and blood maternity and paternity), “One Battle After Another” owes something to “Les Misérables.” But equally compelling is Anderson’s instinct for making his viewers believe in all sorts of utterly cartoonish ridiculousness without a whisper of doubt in the emotional authenticity of his characters. In this sense, “One Battle After Another” echoes the frequent modus operandi of Stanley Kubrick, whose “Dr. Strangelove” is paid righteous tribute.

Throughout his entire filmography, Anderson’s passion for actors has manifested in any number of career-best turns. Here, DiCaprio and Penn put on a clinic, going big and going for broke with wild choices wholly committed to the bit and committed to the bite. The wickedly propulsive rhythm of “One Battle After Another” quickens the pulse; absolutely anything could happen at any moment (and often does). But Anderson knows exactly how to nest the anxiousness within the twin pursuits of outrageous laughs and genuine pathos. Many critics have noted poignant autobiographical self-reflection from the father of four. Each and every scene DiCaprio shares with newcomer Chase Infiniti is pure magic and unconditional love.

Even though DiCaprio, Penn and Infiniti form the crucial triangle at the beating heart of “One Battle After Another,” Anderson, true to form, comes up with juicy roles for the rest of the ensemble. Del Toro walks off with every scene in which he appears and Teyana Taylor, as Bob’s lover and collaborator Perfidia Beverly Hills, is pure fire. Even with fleeting screen time, the members of the radical French 75 and the horrifying Christmas Adventurers Club punch well above their weight class. It is impossible to watch “One Battle After Another” without thinking of the current dismal assault on due process, decency and democracy, but Anderson makes good on the ceaseless struggle indicated in his title by crafting something both timely and timeless.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Filmmaker Melanie Oates follows 2019 feature debut “Body and Bones” with another thoughtful and well-observed drama in which the challenges and limitations of the small town put pressure on a young woman yearning for something greater than provincial dead-ends. In “Sweet Angel Baby,” which premiered last year in the Toronto Film Festival’s Centerpiece program, Eliza (Michaela Kurimsky) hides two significant secrets from the close-knit community members she sees every day at the diner where she works and the church where she worships. One is her artistic outlet: a social media account to which Eliza posts artful, erotic, and anonymous self-portraits posed frequently in outdoor spaces. The second is her queerness: Eliza is privately entangled with co-worker Toni (Elle-Máijá Tailfeathers), an outsider tolerated but not wholly welcomed by the townsfolk.

Oates has in Kurimsky a superior collaborator. The director-actor dynamic might remind some viewers of the almost telepathic relationship shared by Kelly Reichardt and Michelle Williams (whose blend of emotional vulnerability and flinty self-possession Kurimsky often evokes), even if “Sweet Angel Baby” isn’t as sophisticated as any of the four movies Reichardt has made with her favorite performer. A cursory glance at the “Sweet Angel Baby” trailer points in the direction of the central conflict: the fallout once family, friends and neighbors discover one or both of Eliza’s private activities. The contemporary take on “The Scarlet Letter” could be the movie’s strongest asset and weakest link, as Oates aims to thread a needle in which her protagonist reckons with negative narrow-mindedness on the path to self-acceptance.

Oates makes a very good choice by writing Eliza as a “woman who takes matters into her own hands” (a description/compliment voiced by one of the residents). Eliza has carved out a position of respect in this coastal Newfoundland fishing hamlet; it comes as no surprise that she is the one to organize and lead the effort to raise the money it will take to save the chapel. But it is Eliza’s double, or perhaps triple, life that keeps us invested. Along the way, Kurimsky manages to convince us that Eliza’s ill-advised reciprocation of romantic overtures made by the married-with-children Shawn (Peter Mooney) can be attributed to frustration and curiosity, even if viewers scream for her to run as fast as possible in the opposite direction.

Sometimes, “Sweet Angel Baby” can feel too simple and too obvious, especially in the post-exposure wrath of certain antagonistic villagers at the ready with metaphorical pitchforks. A number of critics have also made compelling arguments that Toni deserved more attention and deeper exploration of her mostly unexamined interiority. Why does she put up with the ostracism and collective cold-shoulder given to her by the rude and homophobic customers? Fortunately, Tailfeathers and Kurimsky have the chops and the chemistry to overcome the melodramatic predictability of several quarrels.

Oates depicts Eliza’s ongoing self-portrait project as an outlet, working hard to imply all the ways that it might represent enough personal liberation to counter the stifling attitudes holding her back from revealing her most authentic outwardly-presented self. Through the variety of fantasies Eliza conjures, the filmmaker hints fleetingly at a kinkier world than Eliza’s mundane realities can offer. Assuredly, the viewer is meant to champion and cheer for the protagonist’s hard-fought triumphs in much the same way that Hawthorne convincingly argued on behalf of Hester Prynne’s inherent goodness.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

As a follow-up to “The Whale,” a raucous adaptation of the first novel in Charlie Huston’s Henry Thompson series was a good choice for eclectic auteur Darren Aronofksy, whose bold visions have attracted a devoted following. Since the mentaculus mania and stark monochrome of “Pi” announced the arrival of an ambitious artistic voice in 1998, Aronofsky has frequently interwoven themes of mysticism and questions of meaning and existence into the lives of obsessive, self-destructive protagonists. Comfortable directing A-list stars at the peak of the Hollywood Olympus, Aronofsky has been equally effective resurrecting stalled careers and lighting fuses for up-and-coming talent.

As the kind of comic crime thriller launched into the stratosphere by Quentin Tarantino’s “Reservoir Dogs” and “Pulp Fiction,” not to mention the work of the Coen brothers, “Caught Stealing” uses a playbook very familiar to Guy Ritchie, David Leitch and others to walk the tightrope suspended between gritty movie-toughness and arch, exaggerated character types always ready for action. Huston, who adapted his own 2004 book of the same name for Aronofsky, makes several key alterations that generally enhance and improve the story as a cinematic experience. The filmmaker has often incorporated grim, dark humor into his worlds, but “Caught Stealing” is surely his most intentionally funny movie to date.

Austin Butler’s Henry, a once promising baseball player whose drinking and driving resulted in the death of a fellow athlete, now tends bar on the Lower East Side. With his ever-present San Francisco giants cap and regular telephone contact with his devoted mother (an uncredited Laura Dern), the affable alcoholic radiates enough charm and devastating good looks for us to understand why paramedic Yvonne (Zoë Kravitz) is willing to put in the time and effort to develop a relationship. Any minor contretemps over Henry’s boozing takes a backseat to the physical release of their erotic spark, which Aronofksy details in a sexy interlude prior to fireworks of a more violent nature.

Apartment neighbor Russ, a classic British punk played with panache by Matt Smith, sets the plot wheels in motion when he asks Henry to watch his cat while on a visit to London to see his ailing father. Smith’s mohawk-adorned hooligan heralds the parade of colorful goons, toughs, and thugs that will soon join a search for the movie’s MacGuffin: a small storage-unit key that might unlock access to a massive amount of cash. In short order, Henry runs afoul of Russian gangsters, a corrupt cop, and ultra-Orthodox Jewish siblings whose grandmother expects some attention and respect at the dinner table. “Caught Stealing” features one of the most absurdly comic Shabbos observations since Walter Sobchak refused to roll in “The Big Lebowski.”

The casting of a beautifully unrecognizable Griffin Dunne as Henry’s boss Paul is Aronofsky’s most blatant nod to Martin Scorsese’s brilliant nocturnal odyssey “After Hours,” but other aspects of Henry’s borderline surreal adventure draw plenty of inspiration from the 1985 cult classic. Butler holds the screen like he was born to do it, finding chemistry with the entire supporting cast (and especially Kravitz, who should have been in more of the movie). In many respects, it is nice to see Aronofsky working with material that isn’t as serious – or self-serious – as we have come to expect. That he manages to escalate tension and keep us on alert for flashes of brutal violence amidst the laughs suggests good things to come.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

Now available on HBO after a theatrical debut earlier this year at Tribeca in the Spotlight Documentary section, “Dear Ms.: A Revolution in Print” considers the groundbreaking impact of the famous feminist magazine through the lenses of three talented moviemakers. Each of the episodes dives into a different topic with as much sophistication and contemplation as might be possible in an anthology feature, although one could easily imagine three complete movies, given the vast amount of material and the ongoing cultural conversations addressing race, intersectionality, misogyny, allyship, pornography, and sexual identity.

Salima Koroma’s first chapter, titled “A Magazine for Women,” establishes the use of simple, eye-catching animation with a vintage-inspired design. Used throughout the duration of the film, these artistic graphics supplement the wealth of archival clips and the newly acquired interviews with many of the participants at the forefront of the periodical’s genesis and expansion. Koroma places into context the idea that a publication by and for women that existed outside the limitations of “traditional,” patriarchy-aligned content (that had focused on homemaking, cooking, cleaning, and parenting) was nothing short of radical. “Ms.” co-founder Gloria Steinem (91 years old at the time of this writing) and other key editors, contributors, activists and voices, including Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Patricia Carbine, Suzanne Braun Levine, and Marcia Ann Gillespie, share illuminating stories.

Former “Ms.” staff writer Lindsy Van Gelder kicks off the second part of the documentary by cheekily suggesting that we talk about the “famous feminist topic” of men. Director Alice Gu’s “A Portable Friend” follows with a montage of sitcom and talk show clips from the likes of “The Mary Tyler Moore Show,” “Saturday Night Live,” “Good Times,” “The Jeffersons,” “The Brady Bunch,” “Taxi,” and “All in the Family” to illustrate assumptions about female subservience in the workplace and the marriage. Throughout the film, landmark issues of “Ms.” merit close consideration, and Gu zooms in on several, including covers on domestic violence, workplace harassment, and the 1975 “men’s issue.” Alan Alda, whose support of gender equality and egalitarianism would turn him into a punching bag/target for conservatives, sits down with Gu for a very good interview.

The third and final segment, directed by Cecilia Aldarondo, is named “No Comment” after the long-running “Ms.” feature made up of frequently reader-submitted examples of horrendously offensive and sexist advertisements from major companies and corporations. The heart of Aldarondo’s exploration, and for my money the most engrossing of the entire feature, is a balanced look at the variety of conundra tangling up sexual exploitation and objectification of women in both the mainstream and adult content industries versus the right of women to choose how they wish to demonstrate and engage in erotic and sexual expression. This philosophical battlefield is but one of the places where sharp disagreements create division within the larger movement.

The death of “Ms.” co-founder Dorothy Pitman Hughes in 2022 unfortunately robs the viewer of her voice in the newly recorded interviews that were collected especially for the documentary. A few critics have taken the filmmakers to task for not expanding the number of comments provided by women of color, but Koroma’s insightful and candid critique of “Ms.” in terms of the magazine’s handling and mishandling of race is certainly a worthwhile start. Right next to its central social, cultural and political themes, “Dear Ms.” is also essential viewing for anyone interested in the history of journalism. The carefully curated cover images, from the now iconic elevation of Wonder Woman as a symbol of power, confidence and self-reliance to Miriam Wosk’s unforgettable illustration of a tearful, pregnant Kali hoisting eight arms encumbered by household obligations, always announced that “Ms.” valued style and substance.

Movie review by Greg Carlson

“Misericordia” premiered at Cannes in 2024 and is now available to see in the United States on the Criterion Channel and other streaming services. In the sharp and thought-provoking thriller from “Stranger by the Lake” writer/director Alain Guiraudie, the viewer is introduced to Jérémie (Félix Kysyl), a mysterious and inscrutable prodigal who returns to his hometown village of Saint-Martial to mourn the death of his mentor. Guiraudie, with more than a dash of Hitchcockian precision, establishes a magnetic bond between Jérémie and the small group of characters in his orbit. Following an inexplicable disappearance, Jérémie is suspected of any number of possibly catastrophic actions. We will ponder and wonder and try to figure him out along with the film’s supporting characters.

Jérémie’s deceased master, the baker Jean-Pierre Rigal (Serge Richard), is survived by wife Martine (Catherine Frot), who appears to cherish the one-time employee as much as her own son, the wary Vincent (Jean-Baptiste Durand). Guiraudie sends a steady electric and erotic current through multiple relationships, suggesting sexual dynamics between Jérémie and each of the three Rigal family members. Additionally, Jérémie expresses an interest in friendly neighbor Walter (David Ayala). And if that is not enough, the country priest, Abbé Grisolles (Jacques Develay), makes his own lust for Jérémie as plain as the erection that will later provide a plausible alibi.

Guiraudie curates a rewarding cinematic experience that might be described as deceptively simple. The concrete sequence of events that unfolds throughout the course of the narrative is completely clear and straightforward. The psychological motivations of Jérémie and others, however, leave our heads spinning and our sense of curiosity reeling. “Misericordia” luxuriates in the amount of breathing room it affords the patient reader/viewer, committing to the show-don’t-tell rule of pure cinema in scene after scene. The filmmaker delights in withholding just enough information; we never come to know exactly why the characters do what they do, but we sure want to keep trying to figure it all out as the scenes unfold.

As the legendary Master of Suspense, Hitchcock routinely operated within the framework of the privileged viewer, in which audience members have access to information unknown to one or more characters. Guiraudie puts his own wicked spin on the “bomb theory,” as  Jérémie’s friends, acquaintances and local law enforcement suspect all kinds of obvious truths without necessarily gaining access to the kind of irrefutable evidence that leaves no doubt. And when some of the most terrible suspicions are confirmed, Guiraudie has a blast defying our expectations by doubling down on the mercies implied by the movie’s title.

Guiraudie flexes a wicked sense of irreverent humor throughout Jérémie’s slow-simmering misadventures. How the veteran director manages to wring wry laughs out of such a morbid set of cover-ups following a brutal death is one of the film’s gifts, especially because Guiraudie pulls it off without exhibiting any disrespect to social and religious institutions. Instead, “Misericordia” reverentially respects human desire – both the sexual and the platonic – as its own kind of spiritual summit on par with the worshipful piety of disciples taking a posture of prayer.